The newly listed UltraGreen.ai has raised pressing questions among investors, analysts, and observers alike. Behind its futuristic branding, critics argue the company is fundamentally a legacy dye seller attempting to capitalize on the AI branding boom.
## 1. The Branding–Reality Mismatch
Despite the “.ai” appended to its name, the company’s business model remains tied almost entirely to Indocyanine Green (ICG).
In FY2024, ICG accounted for **94.2%** of total revenue — a hallmark of single-product dependence.
The touted “AI platform” is unproven, with near-zero revenue contribution. This has led many to liken the strategy to the **dot-com era**, where companies added buzzwords to inflate valuation multiples.
## 2. A Fragile, Outsourced Supply Chain
UltraGreen has no in-house production. Instead, it depends on contract manufacturers—with its key active ingredient currently sourced primarily from **one supplier**.
This creates:
- Single-point failure risk
- No price control
- Exposure to delays
A disruption in 2024 already caused months-long bottlenecks.
Analysts warn that one factory incident could temporarily wipe out inventory.
## 3. Weakening Financials
UltraGreen’s recent financials show key stress indicators:
- Net margins fell from **47.7%** → **36.6%**
- FX losses totaled **US$7.0M** in 1H2025
- The IPO price implies an **82.3% dilution** relative to NAV
These trends point toward declining financial health and poor hedging strategy.
## 4. Regulatory Concerns
The prospectus discloses:
- A **“major deficiency”** flagged by Irish regulators (HPRA)
- Liability surrounding **off-label usage**
- U.S. market restrictions due to **competitor exclusivity** until 2026
Such issues highlight compliance vulnerability.
## 5. SGX Structural Risk
Industry commentary suggests the Singapore Exchange (SGX-ST) faces:
- Competency gaps in reviewing complex listings
- A risk-averse culture
Critics argue this environment may enable companies to position themselves as tech innovators despite financial red flags.
## 6. Ownership Concerns
Post-IPO, the Renew Group retains **~61.9%** control.
This means:
- Voting check here power is heavily concentrated
- Complex reporting lines persist due to overlapping leadership roles.
## 7. Risks to the Core Business
UltraGreen’s reliance on ICG faces new threats:
- Emerging **spectral imaging** technologies that don’t require injection dyes
- A recently sold PACS business, reducing proven tech revenue
- An AI platform that the prospectus admits may contain **bugs and defects**
This raises doubts about whether the company’s pivot toward AI is credible or merely valuation-driven.
## Bottom Line
UltraGreen.ai’s prospectus, corporate structure, and market positioning collectively reveal a company straddling old-world products and new-world claims.
Investors should approach with careful due diligence.
This analysis is based solely on the UltraGreen.ai Limited Prospectus dated 26 Nov 2025 and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.